surprised In a previous posting ( People's Aid. work sick less), I pointed out that the so-called "study" of the people using the Titiel "Poverty causes illness" is the not prove .
The People's Aid has indeed leave a comment on my blog, but responded with a private email.
is claimed in this email, "other sources" would be "strong evidence" to prove the claim that poverty'm sick (as opposed to disease as a possible cause of poverty). As the only such source is the study cited "Social Inequality and Health" of ÖBIG There are also some allegations einschägige -. But if we look at what actually evidence will we see that it is rather the opposite. For example, the correlation the health status of the profession at higher rates than income (p.19: "It should be noted also that the income-related health disparities are less pronounced than is the case with the professional group-related inequalities.") ; Note the word choice: income-related health inequalities, not income caused .
the Schlussfogerungen on p.63 we read: "It remains an open question, why the poor health with decreasing socioeconomic status in the rule." In Clear text, it is not known whether "economic status" causes disease or illness tends to work capacity and thus reduce income - still trumpeted its claim to help people out as if it were a proven fact.
The second point in my previous posting the following was:
Since we are on the subject lies: the Boschüre maintained even in passing, that the evil "neo-classical economic theory," supposedly "the presence of at least a base of poor and excluded people" demand. Again, this allegation is without any evidence, only a general allegation that the find in Friedrich Hayek. This is particularly bizarre: First,This point has received no public assistance - after all, they have not disputed. Is there perhaps an approach of honesty in place?
Hayek before for over 60 years in favor of a basic income (see eg the book "Hayek on Hayek");
second straight was Hayek not a neo-classicists (you can of course discuss what means exactly neoclassicism, but "rational expectations" and "neutrality of money" are well to both vertägt badly with Hayek).
0 comments:
Post a Comment